Y ahushua the messiah preexisted as the eloah or ruach being called Yahu Yahweh.1 In Scriptures he is one of two ruling eloahi, being the son of father Yahweh, with whom he is dja (akhad; unified). 2 Together they are called Yahweh eloahi (a collective noun).3 It was in his ruach form as the angel Yahu Yahweh that Yahushua made the Covenants of Promise with Abraham. When speaking with Moses, this angel called Yahweh said, “I am the eloahi of your fathers, the eloahi of Abraham, the eloahi of Isaak, and the eloahi of Jacob.”4 At the time that the angel sent Moses to the Israelites in Egypt, he told him, “Thus shall you say unto the sons of Israel, Yahweh eloahi of your fathers, the eloahi of Abraham, the eloahi of Isaak, and the eloahi of Jacob, has sent me (Moses) unto you. This is my (the angel Yahweh’s) name for μl[ (olam, the world-age) and this is my memorial unto all generations.” 5 Proof of His Preexistence There are eight areas of proof demonstrating that Yahushua preexisted as the angel Yahu Yahweh. 6 • First, Yahushua is said to have preexisted. John the baptist notified his followers that Yahushua existed “before me,” 7 this despite the fact that John was conceived six months prior to Yahushua.6 Yahushua himself told the Jews that he existed “before Abraham,”8 and in a prayer to father Yahweh just prior to his death, Yahushua asked father Yahweh, “now glorify me father with yourself, with the glory which I had with you before the world was.”9 • Second, Yahushua is specifically identified as an eloah ( qeov~ ; deity) “manifested in The Preexistence of the Messiah 1 See FSDY: The Festivals and Sacred Days of Yahweh, Volume 1, Qadesh La Yahweh Press, Garden Grove, CA, 1998, Introduction to The Three Volumes, pp. 2f, footnote 4; Chap. I, pp. 7f, p. 7, footnote 4; and Appendix C. 2 Compare with Deut., 6:4, “Hear Israel Yahweh our eloahi, Yahweh is akhad (unified), 10:17, “for Yahweh your eloahi, he is the eloahi of the eloahim”; Zech., 14:9, “In the day there shall be Yahweh akhad (unified), and his name akhad (unified).” For this reason Yahushua said, “I and the father are one (unified)” (John, 10:30, 17:11, 21, and so forth). This form of oneness (akhad) is as in a mar- riage, e.g., Gen., 2:24, where Adam and Eve were akhad (one) flesh; compare with 1 Cor., 6:16f, 11:2f; Eph., 5:22–24. The early Ante- Nicaean Christians also recognized two Yahweh’s, one uncreated and the other created. To demonstrate, Origen (Origenous Dialektos pros Herakleidan 1f) speaks of the uncreated father and created son and notes that they are distinct from one another, yet they are one. Origen writes, “And the two deities become a unity.” Heraclides agreed that this was the Christian view and Origen gives the example of Adam and Eve being one in the flesh as a type of this unity (Origen, Origenous Dialektos pros Herakleidan, 2f). Also see Hippolytus, Noetus, 7, which notes that this oneness in the deity refers to two persons (the father and the son), and one power (the spirit). 3 The Hebrew generic term for deity is hla (eloah; mighty being). The plural and collective noun forms are yhla (eloahi) and μyhla (eloahim)—a collective noun being a collection of persons or things regarded as a single unit (e.g., family, army, and so forth). These terms and the title la (el; mighty one) have been indiscriminately glossed into English by the single word God. Each term actually has its own unique meaning (see SNY: The Sacred Name hwhy , Qadesh La Yahweh Press, Garden Grove, CA, 1995, chap. i). Available at, www.yahweh.org. For example, eloah is singular and eloahi is plural. When eloahi is used in reference to the two Yahwehs, it becomes a collective noun, the two eloah being dja (akhad; “united” into one unit, unified) (Hebrew-English Lexicon. Zondervan Edition, 1970, p. 10; SEC: Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, Heb. #258, 259), the same word used when a husband and wife are united in a marriage (Gen., 2:24; compare with Eph., 5:33–32; 1 Cor., 6:15–17), i.e., “Yahweh eloahi is akhad (unified)” (Deut., 6:4; Zech., 14:9). As a body of beings ruled by father Yahweh the collective noun eloahim is used, i.e., ”Yahweh is the eloahi of the eloahim” (Deut., 10:17). The fol- lowing are two examples, out of many, proving the existence of two Yahwehs: In Genesis, 19:24f, we read, “And YAHWEH RAINED upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah, brimstone and fire FROM YAHWEH out of the heavens.” Two Yahwehs are named—one Yahweh was on the earth, speaking to both Abraham and Lot (compare with Gen., 18:1–19:23); the other Yahweh was in the heavens. The Yahweh on the earth brought fire and brimstone down on the sinful cities FROM the Yahweh who was in the heavens. In Zech., 10:12, we are told that it is Yahweh who is speaking. This Yahweh then reports, “And I will strengthen them in Yahweh and in his name they shall walk, says Yahweh.” In this passage Yahweh the son is speaking. He notes that he will strengthen the Israelites in Yahweh the father and in his (father Yahweh’s) name they shall walk. One Yahweh, accordingly, is speaking of another Yahweh who has ownership of the sacred name. 4 Exod., 3:2–6. Though he is called Yahweh in Exod., 3:4, 7, he is described as an angel in Exod., 3:2, and Acts, 7:30–35. 5 Exod., 3:15. 6 John, 1:29–34. 7 Luke, 1:24–35. 8 John, 8:56–58. 9 John, 17:4f. A rticle S erieS Q AdeSh l A Y Ahweh P reSS c oPYright © 2020flesh.”10 Thomas, for example, calls him, “my sovereign and my eloah.”11 The apostle John, in reference to Yahushua as the logov~ (logos; innermost expression, word),12 writes: In the beginning was the logos, and the logos was with eloah (the father), and the logos was an eloah. He was in beginning with eloah (the father) . . . And the logos became flesh, and tabernacled among us.13 Saul twice makes the claim that Yahushua is one of the two eloah called Yahweh (i.e., Yahweh eloahi). Saul, bondman of Yahweh and the apostle of Yahushua the messiah according to the trust of the elect of Yahweh and the knowledge of the truth which is according to piety; in the hope of eternal life, which eloah (the father) who cannot lie promised before the ages of time, but manifested in its own seasons his logos (word, innermost expres- sion = the messiah) in the procla- mation which I was entrusted with according to the commandment of our saviour eloah (Yahushua).14 For the grace of eloah (father Yahweh) which brings salvation appeared for all men, instructing us that, having denied impious and worldly desires, discreetly and righteously and piously we should live in the present age, awaiting the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great eloah and sav- iour, Yahushua the messiah.15 Yahu is similar in kind to father Yahweh,16 i.e., he is also an eloah or ruach (spirit) being who exists in the image of father Yahweh17—a phrase referring to an offspring, 18 and especial- ly in this case a son who is sinless as father Yahweh is sinless.19 Finally, both Yahushua’s followers and oth- ers, as demonstrated by the ancient Shem Tob Hebrew edition of Matthew, either recognized or ridiculed his claim as μyqla ˆb (ben elo- qim; son of eloahim), μyqlah ˆb (ben ha-elo- qim; son of the eloahim), qwlah ˆb (ben ha- eloq; son of the eloah), and lah ˆb (ben ha-el; son of the el).20 All of these terms, whether sin- gular or collective nouns, were translated into the Greek of the New Testament as singular 10 1 Tim., 3:16. 11 John, 20:28. 12 That the term lovgo~ (logos) refers to the innermost thought as spoken, see Greek-English Lexicon to the New Testament, Lex., p. 60 (This lexicon is located in the back of The Interlinear Literal Translation of the Greek New Testament. George Ricker Berry. Zondervan Publishing House, Michigan, 1958.), “used by John as a name of Christ, the Word of God, i.e., the expression or manifestation of his thoughts to man”; SEC, #3056, “something said (including the thought) . . . spec. (with the art. in John) the Divine Expression (i.e. Christ).” Logos is the Greek translation of the Hebrew term rbd (debar) (see A Concordance to the Septuagint and the Other Greek Versions of the Old Testament. Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1991., 2, pp. 881–886). Debar means, “a word; by impl. a matter (as spoken of) or thing; adv. a cause” ( SEC, Heb. #1697). If the reference was merely to speaking or answering then the Hebrew term rma (amar) suffices SEC, Heb. #559–562). Debar is the active thought of that which is spoken. It arises from one’s innermost thought. Therefore, as an example, the Ten Commandments are called the ten μyrbd (debarim; innermost thoughts, the plural of debar) (Exod., 34:28; Deut., 4:13, 10:4; compare with the LXX Exod., 34:28, Deut., 10:4, which gives lovgou~, plural logos).aa 13 John, 1:1–2, 14. 14 Titus, 1:1–4. 15 Titus, 2:11–13. 16 John, 5:17f, Yahushua “called eloah his own father, making himself i[son (ison; similar in kind) to the eloahi.” The term i[son (ison) means, “similar (in amount of kind),” ”equal to, the same as,” “equal, like” ( SEC, Gk. #2470; GEL: An Intermediate Greek- English Lexicon. At the Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968, p. 384). 17 2 Cor., 4:4; Col., 1:15–20. 18 Compare with Gen., 5:3. 19 The father is perfect (Matt., 5:48) and Yahushua, like him, never sinned (1 John, 3:5; 1 Pet., 1:19, 2:21f; Heb., 4:15, 7:26, 9:14; 2 Cor., 5:21). 20 Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, Mercer University Press, 1995, Matt., 4:3, 8:29, 14:33, 16:16, 26:23, 27:40, 43, 54. In the Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, the forms μyqla (eloqim) and qwla (eloq) are used for μyhla (eloahim) and hwla (eloah). Pious Jews often used q to deform the generic names of the deity (Corpus of the Aramaic Incantation Bowls. Society of Biblical Literature and Scholars Press. University of Montana, Missoula, Montana. Disertation Series, Number 17, 1975, p. 39, footnote 3). 2 t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAhforms of the Greek word for deity, namely, qeou` (theou), qeo~ (theos), etc.—thereby, call- ing him the ”son of the deity,” knowledge of which was basic scriptural doctrine.21 Indeed, Yahushua not only claimed that he was “the son of eloahim”22 but also reported, “I and the father are one (akhad in Hebrew, i.e., unified).”23 At hearing his claim, the Jews wished to stone him.24 The grounds for this stoning were twofold. The first charge was blasphemy,25 because Yahushua said, “I am the son of eloahim.”26 Since Yahushua was also saying that he was akhad with father Yahweh, the Jews understood his claim as “the son of eloahim” to mean that Yahushua was proclaim- ing himself to be the archangel carrying the sacred name, i.e., the second or lesser Yahweh. To demonstrate the Jewish understanding dur- ing this period, the mid-first century C.E. Jewish priest and writer Philo writes: But if there be any as yet unfit to be called the son of the qeou` (theou; deity) let him press to take his place under his (the deity’s) first-born, the logos (word, inner most expression), who holds the eldership among the angels, their archangel as it were. And many names are his, for he is called, “the beginning,” and (hav- ing) THE NAME of the deity (i.e., the name Yahweh), and (being) his logos, and the man after his image, and “he that sees,” that is Israel.27 Philo refers to this archangel as our “con- trolling guide, the divine logos (word, inner- most expression)”28 and adds: For as long as he (mankind) falls short of perfection, he has the divine logos as his leader; since there is an oracle which says, “Lo, I send my angel before your face, to guard you on your road, that he may bring you into the land which I have prepared for you: give heed to him, and hearken to him, disobey him not; for he will not withdraw from (i.e., pardon) you; 29 FOR MY NAME IS IN HIM (Exod., 23:20f).”30 The last line in the Hebrew text more pre- cisely reads, “for he will not forgive your trans- 21 E.g., Matt., 14:33, 16:15–17; John, 1:34, 49, 11:27; as basic doctrine see 1 John, 4:15, 5:1–5, 12. 22 John, 10:34–36, quoting Ps., 82:6. John, 19:7, “he made himself the son of eloah.” 23 See above footnote 2. 24 John, 10:22–40. This passage reflects the fact that the Jews understood that when the messiah made the claim that he was the son of eloahim (i.e., the son of the deity) that he was claiming to be one of the eloahi. For example, the angel Yahweh is called the “son of ˆyhla (eloahin; Aramaic for eloahim)” in Dan., 3:25. In the LXX the Aramaic collective noun ˆyhla (eloahin) is rendered by the singular “qeou` (theou; deity).” That the Jews recognized that the son of the deity was the angel who possessed the divine name see the discussion of the Jewish writer Philo (mid-first century C.E.), De Confusione Linguarum, 28 §146, 147, De Migratione Abrahami., 31 §174, Quis Rerum Divinarum Heres, 42 §205f. Another example of the doctrine of the lesser Yahweh among the Jews is found in the Apocalypse of Abraham, composed sometime between 70 C.E. and the end of the Bar Kochba revolt in 135 C.E. (The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, 2 vols. Edited by James H. Charlesworth. Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York, 1985. 1, p. 683). While dealing with the story in Gen., 15:1–17, where we read that Yahweh revealed himself to Abraham and made a covenant with him, the Apocalypse of Abraham reports that this deity identified himself as “the angel Yahu-el (Yahu is el)” (Apocalypse of Abraham, 13:1, 10:3–8). The angel Yahu-el adds that he possessed “the ineffable name” (Apocalypse of Abraham, 10:3, 7f). 25 The Jewish charge of a blasphemy worthy of the death penalty was derived from their interpretation of an unauthorized use of the sacred name, see SNY, chap. xiii. Available at, www.yahweh.org. 26 John, 10:33, compare with 36–38. Also see Matt., 26:63, where the high priest and leaders of the Jews asked Yahushua if he was claiming to be “the messiah, the son of qeou` (theou; the deity—the Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, Mercer University Press, 1995, has ha el)” (Matt., 27:40–43; Luke, 22:70). The angels and demons made a similar pronouncement (e.g., Matt., 8:29; Mark, 3:11, 5:7; Luke, 1:30–35, 4:41, 8:28). 27 Philo, De Confusione Linguarum, 28 §146. 28 Philo, De Migratione Abrahami, 12 §67. 29 Philo and the LXX both read, “ ouj ga;r mh; uJposteivlhtaiv se (ou gar me upostiletai se).” The word uJposteivlhtaiv (upostiletai) means, “draw back . . . take away, remove . . . shrink from” (GEL, pp. 1895f). The sentence refers to the angel not drawing back from punishing the disobedient. C. D. Yonge, accordingly, translates this verse to read, “for he will not pardon your transgressions” (Yonge, Philo, loc. cit.). 30 Philo, De Migratione Abrahami, 31 §174. t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAh 3gressions; for my name is within his midst.”31 The Jews, therefore, were fully aware of the archangel known as the son of the deity and the logos of father Yahweh. They clearly under- stood that he was the angel discussed in Exodus, 23:20–23, who carried Yahweh’s name, could forgive sins,32 and to whom the Israelites were to be obedient. On this point both Jews and Christians of the first century C.E. agreed. The Jews differed from the Christians in that they did not believe that Yahushua, who they saw as only a mortal man, was this archangel Yahweh. This disagreement brings us to the second charge made by the Jews against Yahushua: “AND because you, being a man, you make yourself a deity (i.e., one of the eloahi).”33 That is, by claiming that he and the father were akhad (one, unified), Yahushua was also mak- ing the claim that he was one of the Yahweh eloahi, for Yahweh eloahi is akhad.34 Many Jews felt that his claim was impossible. How could Yahushua, since he was merely a man and mortal, be the angel Yahweh, the son of eloahim (eloah, el), that is, the son of the deity? The early Christians, of course, argued with the Jews that this preexistence of Yahushua as the angel Yahweh was precisely the case.35 • Third, Yahushua was the creator.36 By means of Yahushua, father Yahweh created all things.37 It is said of father Yahweh, “because you did create all things, and for your will they are, and were created.”38 Therefore, father Yahweh was speaking to Yahushua (Yahu Yahweh) when he commanded in Genesis, “Let us make man in our image.”39 These verses prove that father Yahweh did the creating, but the statement, “Let us make man in our image,” also shows that there was another being involved in the project. As Ephesians and Hebrews observe, the father created the world “through Yahushua the messiah.”40 Therefore, the one providing the power and the instructions was father Yahweh and the one carrying out these orders was his son, the angel Yahu Yahweh, who later became Yahushua the messiah. As a result, Yahushua had to preexist as an eloah being and as part of the eloahi of the eloahim.41 These eloahi of the eloahim, who 31 Exod., 23:21, “wbrqb ymç yk μk[çpl açy al yk.” The Heb. word brq (qereb), which is used in this verse, means, “the inward part of body, considered the seat of laughter . . . thoughts Je 4 14 . . . body, corpse (of cows) Gn 41 21 . . . womb (of pregnant woman) . . . inner parts of sacrificial animal Ex 12 9 ; interior, middle . . . in (the midst of)” (CHAL: A Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. William GB. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1971, p. 324). Therefore, the name of Yahweh is more than just on this angel, it is inside of him, i.e., part of his very being. 32 After the death of the messiah, and in an effort to oppose the Christian argument, the rabbinic Jews reinterpreted the words of Exod., 23:21. By using a rather strained exegesis, they now denied that the angel Yahweh could forgive sins (Christianity in Talmud and Midrash. Reference Book Publishers, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey, 1966, pp. 289f). 33 John, 10:33. 34 See above footnote 2. 35 E.g., Justin Martyr, Trypho, 56:4, 58:3; Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem, 5:19:3; Eusebius, De Demonstratio Evangelica, 5:5, 6:1, P.E., 7:12; Origen, De Principiis, Pref., 1:4; Hippolytus, Noetus, 5, 8, 14. These debates are even recorded in Jewish sources, e.g., Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin, 38b (that these minim or heretics here were Christians see The Sages: Their Concepts and Beliefs. The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University Press, pp. 138f; Christianity in Talmud and Midrash. Reference Book Publishers, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey, 1966, pp. 285–290). 36 That the creator being was Yahweh, see Gen., 6:7; Isa., 42:5f, 43:1, 45:6–8, 54:6–17. It was the creator Yahweh who rested on the seventh day (Gen., 2:1–3; compare with Exod., 31:17). 37 John, 1:3f, 10; Col., 1:15–18; Heb., 1:1f; Eph., 3:8f. 38 Rev., 4:1–11, esp. v. 11, and compare with 10:5f. 39 Gen., 1:26. 40 Eph., 3:8f; Heb., 1:1f. 41 Deut., 10:17, “for Yahweh your eloahi, he is the eloahi of the eloahim.” This statement reveals that the eloahi (a collective noun when used for the two Yahwehs) ruled over the eloahim, or body of ruach (spirit) beings (Ps., 104:4; Heb., 1:7). That the collective noun eloahim includes the ruach angels (compare with Heb., 2:5–9, and Ps., 8:5) is even affirmed by EJ, 2, p. 957. They are the sons of the eloahim (see Job, 1:6, 2:1, 38:7, compare with LXX; Gen., 6:2–5, compare with Josephus, Antiquities, 1:3:1; Alexandrian LXX and Philo, De Gigantibus, 2, “the angels of the sovereign (i.e., Yahweh),” called “Watchers” by the book of Jubilees, 4:15, 22, 5:1; “the angels, the children of heaven,” by 1 Enoch, 6:2, and the “angels” who had “fallen away” from eloah in the discussion by the second century Christian writer Justin Martyr, Trypho, 79:1). As a result, biblical scholars like R. A. Stewart, in the New Bible Dictionary, con- clude that the expression sons of (the) eloahim “means simply angels” (New Bible Dictionary, p. 37). Ruach angels can behold the face of father Yahweh (Matt., 18:10) and are exceedingly numerous (Matt., 26:53; Heb., 12:22; Rev., 5:11; Ps., 68:17). 4 t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAhare also simply called eloahim, created the world and all the things in it. 42 • Fourth, Yahushua is identified with Yahu Yahweh. In a direct reference to Yahushua, John the baptist cites Isaiah, which states, “The voice of one calling in the wilderness, Prepare the road of Yahweh, make straight in the desert a highway for our eloahi.”43 John’s comment, and his recog- nition that Yahushua had previously existed,44 reveals that John the baptist knew that Yahushua was Yahu Yahweh, the son of Yahweh. Indeed, this fact is also revealed by Yahushua’s earthly names, Yahushua and Immanuel.45 Yahushua means, “Yahu saves,”46 for Yahushua was to save his people Israel,47 and Immanu-el means, “el is with us,” 48 Yahu Yahweh being the el (mighty one) of Israel. 49 In addition, Yahushua was the eloah called Yahweh that was seen by Abraham and the other patriarchs. This detail is uncovered by the fact that father Yahweh is the only being who has always been innately immortal. No human, except for the preexistent messiah, has either seen father Yahweh and his actual form or heard his actual voice at any time.50 No earthly man is capable of seeing him because father Yahweh dwells in unapproachable light.51 On the other hand, the Yahweh with whom the patriarchs had contact was both personally seen by men,52 even in his divine form,53 and his voice was heard by men.54 At the same time, Yahushua claimed that he and Abraham per- sonally saw each other.55 Accordingly, Yahu was the eloah who made the Covenants of 42 Gen., 1:1–2:4, 5:1–2; Deut., 4:32; Mal., 2:10. 43 Isa., 40:3, quoted in Matt., 3:3; Mark, 1:3, compare with 14f. 44 John, 1:29–34. 45 Matt., 1:21–23. 46 FSDY, Volume 1, Qadesh La Yahweh Press, p. 7, footnote 4. Christian writers until Eusebius, for example, define the Hebrew name [çwhy to mean “ΔIaw; swthriva (Iao soteria; Yahu saves)” (Eusebius, De Demonstratio Evangelica, 4:17:23). 47 Matt., 1:21. 48 Matt., 1:23; compare with Isa., 7:14, 8:8. Also see SEC, Gk. #1694, Heb. #6005 (from #5973 and 410). 49 For the numerous references to both Yahwehs as el see Analytical Concordance to the Bible. Robert Young. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1968, p. 411, under #2. Mighty one, la el. 50 John, 1:18, 5:37, 6:45, compare with 3:13. Visions of the father, on the other hand, would not be included (e.g., Dan., 7:9–14, compare with 7:1, 13; Rev., 4:1–5:10, compare with 1:4f; Luke, 9:28–36, esp. v. 35; Mark, 9:2–10, esp. v. 7; Matt., 17:1–9, esp. v. 5 and 9; which also explains the voice heard in Matt., 3:17, Mark, 1:9–11; Luke, 3:21f). Visions are only images and imitated sounds. They are not reality. 51 1 Tim., 6:13–16. 52 Yahweh the father dwells in unapproachable light. This lesser Yahweh, on the other hand, could be approached: his human, man- ifested physical form could be seen as well as part of his innermost divine self. This could not be possible if it was father Yahweh. One Yahweh personally appeared to men. The Hebrew term used for “appeared” is har (raah), which means, “to see . . . seeing, i.e. expe- riencing” (SEC, Heb. #7200, 7202). The approachable Yahweh told Moses, “I am Yahweh, and I APPEARED TO (i.e., was seen by) Abraham, to Isaak, and to Jacob as el shaddai (the all powerful el).” These appearances could either be in vision or in personal form. The following are some examples of a Yahweh appearing in personal form, thereby proving that this Yahweh was not father Yahweh: Yahweh appeared to Abraham (Gen., 12:6–9, 17:1–22 [v. 22, after Yahweh finished talking with him, “eloahim ascended from Abraham”], 18:1–33). Yahweh appeared to Isaak (Gen., 26:1–5, 23f), to Jacob (Gen., 35:9–15, 48:3), to Moses (Exod., 3:2–4:17 [esp. notice 4:1]), to both Moses and Joshua (Deut., 31:14–16), and to King Solomon (2 Chron., 7:12–16). Yahweh also appeared to the Israelites (Lev., 9:1–24). A list of other examples are as follows: Gen., 3:8–19, Yahweh was in the Garden of Eden and talked with Adam and Eve. Gen., 19:27, Abraham stood at the face of Yahweh. Exod., 24:9–11, Yahweh ate with the 70 elders of Israel, “and they saw the eloahi of Israel.” Num., 14:14, Yahweh was seen eye to eye by the Israelites. Deut., 34:10, And never since has a prophet like Moses arisen in Israel, whom Yahweh knew face to face. Deut., 5:4f, Yahweh talked to you (the Israelites) face to face at the mountain in the midst of the fire. You were afraid of the face of Yahweh. 53 Exod., 33:12–23. Moses saw the back of Yahweh’s dbk (kabad; splendor, glory) (SEC, Heb. #3519; HEL: Hebrew-English Lexicon. Zondervan Edition, 1970, p. 120), therefore, his innermost being, i.e., the form as he appears before the throne of Yahweh and not as when he is manifested to men. 54 See for example the following: Exod., 33:11, “And Yahweh would speak to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend.” Gen., 18:10–15, Yahweh spoke to Sarah and Abraham. Gen., 18:17–33, Yahweh spoke to Abraham (esp. v. 33). Num., 16:20, Yahweh spoke to Moses and Aaron. Deut., 4:36, “He (Yahweh) made you hear his voice out of the heavens, that he might correct you; and he made you to see his great fire upon the earth; and YOU DID HEAR HIS WORD out of the midst of the fire.” Josh., 1:1, Yahweh spoke to Joshua. 55 John, 8:56. t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAh 5Promise containing the inheritance of eternal life with Abraham. He was the angel Yahweh, 56 the “angel of the covenant.”57 As a point of interest, the Ante-Nicaean Christian fathers not only argued that Yahushua was the angel Yahweh, calling him the second or lesser Yahweh, but also proclaimed him to be the lesser deity of the eloahi.58 As another example, Yahushua, while heal- ing a paralytic, forgave him of his sins. The Jews watching this immediately charged Yahushua with blasphemy, stating, “Who is able to forgive sins, except eloahi alone?” Yahushua retorted by reaffirming his claim, stating that he forgave the man so that ”you may know that the son of man has authority on the earth to forgive sins.”59 We know that the collective noun form “eloahi” is the correct translation of the Greek word qeov~ (theos; deity) in the above passage because the Jews were fully aware that both the angel Yahweh, as well as father Yahweh, could forgive sins.60 Indeed, only those who have the power to pass on something in a covenant con- tract can forgive those who sin under that covenant. As John notes, “If we confess our sins, faithful he (Yahushua) is and righteous, that he may forgive our sins, and may cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”61 These state- ments clearly identify Yahushua with the angel Yahweh, who was the eloah who made the covenants with Abraham and the Israelites. He could forgive sins against these contracts because he authored them. • Fifth, Yahushua (Yahu Yahweh) was sent by father Yahweh out of heaven to do his will among men. Yahushua is several times report- ed to have been sent to earth by father Yahweh. 62 Yahushua, for example, states: For I have come down out of the heaven, not that I should do my will, but the will of him who sent me.63 In the book of Zechariah we read that one Yahweh will be sent to mankind by the other Yahweh. Sing and rejoice daughter of Zion, for behold, I come and I WILL DWELL IN YOUR MIDST, SAYS YAH- WEH; and many nations shall be joined to Yahweh in that day, and they will be to me for a people and I WILL DWELL IN YOUR MIDST, and you shall know that YAHWEH OF HOSTS HAS SENT ME TO YOU.64 56 For the Yahweh who was called an angel see the following examples: Yahweh, the angel who made the covenant with Abraham (Gen., 15:1–21, 17:1–27, 26:1–5, 28:1–22, 35:9–15; compare with Exod., 6:2; Judg., 2:1–2; 2:19f; Mal., 3:1). Hagar and the angel Yahweh, who is an el (Gen., 16:6–14; compare with Josephus., Antiquities., 1:10:4; Exod., 33:23). Yahweh was one of the three angels who met Abraham and later went to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen., 18:1–19:29; compare with Josephus., Antiquities, 1:11:2, 4). The angel Yahweh was at the attempted sacrifice of Isaak (Gen., 22:1–19; compare with Josephus., Antiquities, 1:13:4). The angel, Yahweh eloahi, was in the vision of the ladder (Gen., 28:10–18; compare with Gen., 31:11–13, 35:1, 7). Jacob wrestled with the angel named Yahweh (Gen., 32:24–32; compare with Hos., 12:3–4; Gen., 35:9–15; Exod., 6:1–4; Josephus., Antiquities, 1:20:2). Yahweh was the angel in the burning bush who met Moses (Exod., 3:1–15; compare with Philo, De Vita Moses, 1:12–14 §65–84; Josephus., Antiquities, 2:12:1–4). Yahweh was the angel in the pillar of cloud (Exod., 13:17–14:24; compare with Philo, De Vita Moses, 1:29). In the MT of Exod., 4:24, Yahweh met Moses on the road, while in the LXX version it is said that the a[ggelo~ kurivou (aggelos kuriou; angel of the sovereign) met him. 57 Mal., 3:1. 58 See for example the following early Christian writers, Justin Martyr, Dialogue wilth the Judahite Trypho, 34:2, 56:1–57:4, 58:3, 10, 59:1–60:4, 61:1 (compare with Josh., 5:13–15), 126:1, 127:4, 128:1, 129:1, First Apology for the Christians, 63; Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem, 2:27:3, 2:27:6f, 5:19:3, 3:24:10; Irenaeus, frag., 23, 53, 54, Contra Haereses, 3:6:1, 4:5:2 (citing Exod., 6:3, and the discussion of this verse in Matt., 22:29), 4:5:4, 4:5:5, 4:9:1, 4:10:1, 4:13:4, 5:15:4; Eusebius, Dee Demonstratio Evangelica, 5:8, 11, 6:1, P.E., 7:12, H.E., 1:2:2–16, 3:27:3; Clement, Exhortation to the Greeks, 1:7f. Hippolytus describes the two Yahwehs and sacred ruach as “two persons,” a father and a son, and “one power” and as “two deities” and an “economy” (Hippolytus, Against the Heresy oif One Noetus, 7, 14). The view of a lesser Yahweh who was given the sacred name by father Yahweh was even acknowledged by some of the early Gnostic groups. The fourth century C.E. The Good News of Truth, for example, states, “And the name of the father is the son. He it is who at the first gave the name to him who proceeded from him and who was himself. And he has begotten him as son. He has given him his name” (The Jung Codex, A. R.Mobray, 1955, pp. 73f). One must not confuse this earlier doctrine of the Christians, about the relationship between father Yahweh and Yahushua, with the Trinity doctrine established later at the Council of Nicaea in 325 C.E. 59 Mark, 2:1–12, esp. v. 7; Luke, 5:17–26, esp. v. 21; Matt., 9:1–8. 60 Based upon Exod., 23:20–23. For Jewish knowledge of the angel with Yahweh’s name see above footnote 24. 61 1 John, 1:7–9. 62 E.g. John, 3:17, 30–35, 4:34, 5:21–24, 30, 36–38, 6:38–40, 44, 57, 8:16, 18, 12:49, 14:24, 7:18–25, 20:21; Acts, 10:36; Gal., 4:4; 1 John, 4:9f, 14; compare with Matt., 10:40; Mark, 9:37; Luke, 9:48. 63 John, 6:38. 64 Zech., 2:10f. 6 t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAhIn this passage, Yahweh the son will dwell in our midst. In that day many nations shall be joined to Yahweh the father and we shall know that Yahweh of hosts, i.e., father Yahweh, has sent him (Yahweh the son) to us. Likewise, in Isaiah we once more find Yahweh speaking of another Yahweh. 65 Yahweh states: Come near to me; hear this; I have not spoken in secret from the begin- ning. From the time of its being there I was; and now my sovereign YAH- WEH HAS SENT ME, and (has sent) his ruach. Thus says Yahweh your redeemer, the sacred one of Israel, I am Yahweh your eloahi who teaches you to profit, leading you on the road you should go. 66 This passage reveals that Yahweh existed at the beginning of creation,67 and now Yahweh his sovereign (i.e., the father Yahweh) has sent Yahweh and his ruach. The one being sent is, by definition, less than the one sending him. For this reason, Yahu Yahweh is often referred to as an angel (dispatched messenger),68 for he has been dispatched by father Yahweh to give humankind his messages. Further, as Yahushua points out, “The ser- vant is not greater than his sovereign nor a messenger greater than he who sent him.”69 For that reason Yahushua reports, “my father is greater than I,” 70 and when someone called him good he retorted, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except one, eloah (father Yahweh).”71 A servant and a messenger do not go out to do their own work or send their own message. Instead, they do the work of their sovereign and speak the message of the one sending them. Yahushua, for example, notes, “For he whom eloah sent speaks the words of eloah.” 72 Therefore, it is no surprise that Yahushua clarifies his own position relative to father Yahweh when he said, “the father who sent me himself gave me the commandment of what I should say and what I should speak.”73 He reported back to father Yahweh, “for the words which you have given me I have given them.” 74 With regard to the work Yahushua per- formed, he clearly stated that the many good works he showed were “from my father” and challenged those opposing him by saying, “If I do not do the works of my father do not trust me; but if I do, even if you do not trust me, trust the works.”75 The evidence proves that father Yahweh had sent the angel Yahu Yahweh out of heaven down to earth to do his work and to bring his message to men. Since no man has been in the third heaven, where father Yahweh dwells, this can only mean that Yahushua preexisted as the angel Yahu Yahweh, sent from heaven to do the father’s bidding. • Sixth, Yahushua was sent by father Yahweh out of the heavens to become a new type of fleshly man. To begin with, Yahushua described himself as the one “whom the father sanctified and sent into the world.”76 He tells us: And no one (of human flesh) has 65 Isa., 48:1–17, and compare with 44:6 with 48:12. 66 Isa., 48:16. 67 Compare with the Hebrew in Gen., 1:1. 68 The word angel, ˚alm (malak) in Hebrew and a[ggelo~ (aggelos) in Greek, means someone who is “dispatched as a deputy; a messenger; spec. of God, i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):—ambassador, angel” (SEC, Heb. #4397–4398, Gk. #32). That there was an angel called Yahweh who acted in father Yahweh’s name see above footnotes 4, 24, 31, 52, 56, and below footnote 102. 69 John, 13:16. 70 John, 14:28. 71 Matt., 19:16f (Hebrew Gospel of Matthew, Mercer University Press, 1995, has la [el], which may be the original or might indi- cate a circumlocution for Yahweh); Mark, 10:17f; Luke, 18:18f. 72 John, 3:34. 73 John, 12:49, compare with 8:28, 14:10. 74 John, 17:8. 75 John, 10:32, 37. 76 John, 10:36. t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAh 7gone up into the heavens EXCEPT HE WHO OUT OF THE HEAV- ENS has come down, the son of man who was in the heavens.77 Not that anyone (of human flesh) has seen the father, except he who is from Yahweh, he has seen the father.78 There is no scriptural statement, whatsoev- er, that Yahushua, while he was a fleshly man living on the earth, ever visited father Yahweh, who resides in the third heavens.79 Indeed, as a flesh and blood human he would be incapable of such a feat.80 Only the angels (ruach beings) can behold father Yahweh’s face. 81 The com- ment that Yahushua is from the father, the unapproachable eloah, and has seen him points to the fact that he preexisted and saw father Yahweh while he lived as one of the eloahi and an archangel in the heavens. It was only after Yahushua was resurrected and quickened that he ascended again to see father Yahweh and sit at his right hand.82 That Yahushua came out of heaven is also testified to by Saul. He writes: So also it has been written, the first man, Adam, was made into a living nephesh; the last Adam into a quickening ruach. But the ruach (man) was not first, but the nephesh (man), then the ruach (man): the first man out of the earth, made of dust; the second man, the sover- eign, OUT OF HEAVEN. Such as he made of dust, such also are those made of dust; and such as the heav- enly, such also the heavenly.83 This passage shows that Yahushua came out of heaven to become a man. Yahu Yahweh’s eloah or ruach angel form was altered into that of a human being. Saul writes: For let this mind be in you which is also in the messiah Yahushua; who, in the form of eloahi ( qeou` ; theou; a deity) subsisting, esteemed it not a thing to be grasped to be like eloah (qew`/`; theo = father Yahweh); but EMPTIED HIMSELF, A BONDMAN’S FORM HAVING TAKEN, IN THE LIKENESS OF MEN HAVING BECOME; and in figure having been found as a man, he humbled himself, having become obedient unto death, even death of the (torture-)stake.84 By saying that Yahushua had emptied him- self and took on a form in the likeness of men, we have here a clear statement that Yahushua preexisted in a different form and then was altered to resemble fleshly man. This point is reinforced by the apostle John, who states: And the logos (innermost expres- sion, word) 85 BECAME FLESH, and tabernacled among us, and we discerned his glory, a glory as a 77 John, 3:13. 78 John, 6:46. 79 2 Cor., 12:1–4; compare with Rev., 2:7, 22:2 (in context with 21:1–22:5). That there is more than one realm of “μymç (shamay- im; heavens),” also written “ymç (shamay; heaven),” see Deut., 10:14; 1 Kings, 8:27; Pss., 68:34, 115:115f, 148:1–4; 2 Chron., 2:6, 6:18; and Neh., 9:6. The first heavens is the atmosphere around the earth (Gen., 1:6–8, 20, 7:11, 23, 8:2, 27:39; Dan., 5:21, 7:2, 13, 8:8, 11:4; 1 Kings, 18:45; Pss., 104:12, 147:8; Matt., 26:64; Mark, 14:62; Deut., 28:12; Acts, 14:17; James, 5:18; Zec., 2:6, 8:12; Job, 35:11, 38:29; Isa., 55:10; Jer., 15:3: Hos., 7:12). It was to this first shamayim (heavens) that Genesis makes reference when discussing the cre- ation of “the shamayim and the earth” (Gen., 1:1–2, compare with 1:6–8; also see Exod., 20:11, 31:17; 2 Chron., 2:12; Ps., 146:6; Jer., 32:17, 51:48; Matt., 5:18, 24:35; Mark, 13:31; Luke, 21:33, Acts, 14:15). Within the bounds of the second heavens set the moon, plan- ets, sun, and stars (e.g., Deut., 4:19; Ps., 8:3; Jer., 8:2; Job, 9:9; Amos, 5:8). In the third realm called shamayim, father Yahweh presently makes his home (e.g., Matt., 5:16, 45, 6:9, 8:21, 12:50, 16:17, 18:14; Mark, 11:25–26; Luke, 11:2; Pss., 8:2, 11:4, 103:19; Deut., 26:15; 1 Kings, 8:39; Job, 22:12; Isa., 66:1). 80 John, 3:13. 81 Matt., 18:10. 82 John, 20:17; Acts, 7:54–57; Rom., 8:33f; Eph., 1:20; Col., 3:1; Heb., 8:1, 10:11–13; 1 Pet., 3:21f. 83 1 Cor., 15:45–49. 84 Phil., 2:5f. 85 See above footnote 12. 8 t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAhmonogenou`~ (mono genous; united, beloved one) 86 with the father, full of grace and truth. John witnesses concerning him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I said, He who after me comes has precedence of me, for he was before me.87 Saul notes that “eloah (father Yahweh), having sent his own son, in the likeness of sin- ful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, that the requirement of the Torah should be fulfilled in us, who not according to flesh walk, but according to ruach.”88 A Psalm pre- dicts that one of the eloahim, called the son of Adam (being the messiah), would be made into a fleshly man. What is a male that you remember him, and the son of Adam that you visit him? And you made him lack a little from eloahim (angels);89 and glory and honor have crowned him. You made him rule over the works of your hands; you have put all under his feet. 90 According to the epistles of Saul, this pas- sage refers to the messiah, the son of man, who was made a little lacking from angels, then later raised to a high position over the works of Yahweh. 91 • Seventh, Yahushua was both the ancestor and a descendant of King David. In Revelation, 22:16, for example, the messiah states, “I am the root and the offspring of David.”92 This statement brings together the fact that Yahweh was both the ancestor of David (i.e., Adam, the ancestor of David, was the son of Yahweh eloahi)93 as well as David’s offspring.94 This circumstance is true only if Yahushua was the creator Yahweh who later joined with the egg of Mariam, the descendant of David, to become Yahushua—a combined human and ruach being. 95 As another example, while teaching at the Temple in Jerusalem, Yahushua answered a question from the Jewish Pharisees—the response being in front of a large crowd. During this conversation, Yahushua asked the Pharisees, “What do you think concerning the messiah? Whose son is he?” They responded, “David’s.” Yahushua (speaking Hebrew) then inquired of them about the puzzle their answer created. Quoting Psalm, 110:1, Yahushua asked them: How then does David in the ruach call him ynda (adeni; my founda- tion)?,96 saying, ”A declaration of hwhy (Yahweh) to ynda (adeni; my foundation), Sit at my right hand until I set your enemies as a stool for your feet.” If therefore David 86 The Greek word monogenou`~ (monogenous), “only born” (SEC, Gk. #3439), “only-begotten, single” (GEL, p. 518), is derived from mono (mono), “remaining, i.e. sole or single” ( SEC, Gk. #3441), and genou`~ (genous), a form of givnomai (ginomai), “a prol. and mid form of a prim. verb; to cause to be (“gen”–erate), i.e. (reflex.) to become (come into being)” ( SEC, Gk. #1096). The LXX at Gen., 22:16, renders the Hebrew word dyjy (yakhid), “prop. united, i.e. sole; by imp. beloved; also lonely” (Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, Heb. #3173), as “beloved son.” The original Hebrew word indicates an offspring that is united with his father and his beloved. The translation monogenou`~ (monogenous) for dyjy (yakhid) is found in Josephus., Antiquities, 1:13:1, and Heb., 11:17. The Greek and Hebrew terms do not refer to an “only son,” as so often asserted. Isaak, for example, was the monogenous offspring of Abraham, despite the fact that Abraham had several other sons, including Ishmael, the older brother of Isaak (Heb., 11:17; compare with Gen., 16:15, 17:19–27, 25:1–6). Rather, monogenous refers to the fact that this particular son is the only qualifying heir that has been begotten (com- pare with Josephus., Antiquities, 20:2:1, esp. 20:2:1 §20), and therefore the “favourite,” and “best-beloved” son ( Zeitschrift für Religions und Geistesgeschichte 5 (1953), pp. 335–365., 5, pp. 335–365). 87 John, 1:14–18. 88 Rom., 8:3f. 89 Ps., 8:4–6, give eloahim, while Heb., 2:7f, translates this word as “angels.” 90 Ps., 8:5–6. 91 Heb., 2:5–9; 1 Cor., 15:24–28; Eph., 1:20–23. 92 Compare with Rev., 5:5, the lamb, or messiah, equals the root of David. 93 Luke, 3:31–37. 94 Luke, 3:23–31. 95 That Yahweh became the fleshly descendant of Abraham see FSDY, Volume 1. Appendix C. Available at, www.yahweh.org. 96 See FSDY, Volume 1. Appendix H. Available at, www.yahweh.org. t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAh 9(who wrote the Psalm) calls him ynda (adeni; my foundation), how can he be his son?97 None of his opposition was able to solve the riddle. Yet the answer is obvious: Yahushua pre- existed as Yahu Yahweh, one of the eloahi who created Adam—i.e., Yahu Yahweh was the pro- genitor and foundation of Adam, the ancestor of David. As Yahushua the messiah, Yahu Yahweh was also the descendant of King David. • Eighth, Yahushua died in order to pass on an inheritance left in a covenant will Yahweh made with Abraham. Saul wrote of this inheritance, “to Abraham, through promise, eloahi granted it (the inheritance).”98 Yet, as the book of Hebrews points out, for this inheritance to be of any value, the one making the will must first die: And for this reason he (Yahushua) is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, death having taken place for redemption of the transgres- sions of the first covenant (i.e., the Old Covenant or Torah of Moses), the promise of the eternal inheri- tance they who have been called might receive. For where there is a diaqhvkh (diatheke; covenant will) it is necessary for the death of the testator to come about.99 This issue has been completely discussed in Part I of The Festivals and Sacred Days of Yahweh100 and its accompanying appendices. For now, we need only point out that the angels of heaven cannot die.101 Yet the angel Yahweh who left Abraham the covenant will had to die, other- wise the promised inheritance is of no value. By Yahu Yahweh becoming the man Yahushua, he could die and pass on this inheritance. For our purpose here, the very fact that Yahushua died in order to pass on an inheritance left by Yahweh eloahi in the Covenants of Promise to Abraham proves that Yahushua pre- existed as one of the eloahi named Yahweh (more specifically, Yahu Yahweh). As a result, it was Yahushua the messiah who personally knew Abraham and left the promise of an inheritance to Abraham and his seed. If Yahushua was not “the angel of the covenant,” as he is called in Malachi,102 i.e., one of the eloahi named Yahweh who promised the inheritance to Abraham, then his death was meaningless. For if the Yahweh who gave the Abrahamic Covenant did not die then no one can ever receive any of the eternal inheritance. The plan works only if Yahushua preexisted as Yahu Yahweh. 97 Matt., 22:44; Mark, 12:36; Luke, 20:42f. That this is a quote from Ps., 110:1, using the name Yahweh, see The Scofield Reference Bible, pp. 1031, footnote k, 1062, footnotes x, y, 1105, footnotes j, k; The Amplified Bible, New Testament, pp. 35, 70, 122; The New Jerusalem Bible, pp. 1646, 1678, 1724. 98 Gal., 3:18. 99 Heb., 9:15–18. 100 FSDY, Volume 1. Available at, www.yahweh.org. 101 Luke, 20:35f. 102 Mal., 3:1. The New Jerusalem Bible footnotes this statement in Mal., 3:1, by saying, “It is most probably an enigmatic designa- tion of Yahweh himself, derived from Ex 3:2; 23:20, see Gn 16:7c. Mt 11:10 implies its application to Jesus.” Most scholars recognize that the angel Yahweh (no word for “of” actually appearing in the Hebrew) is identified in Scriptures with Yahweh eloahi (i.e., as deity). While speaking of the angel in Exod., 23:20–23f, M. Noth comments, “The ‘angel’ is the ambassador of Yahweh (compare with ‘my angel,’ v. 23) who represents Yahweh himself and in whom Yahweh himself is present; the latter is expressed in v. 21 by saying that the ‘name’ of Yahweh is present in the ‘angel’ as the name represents the one who bears it” (Exodus: A Commentary, M. Noth. Old Testament Library, London: S.C.M. Press, LTDl, 1962. p. 193; and quoted in Yahweh: The Divine Name in the Bible, Wilfred Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ontario, 1975, p. 15). The New Bible Dictionary, p. 38, speaks of the angel Yahweh by noting, “In many passages he is virtually identified with God as an extension of the divine personality, and speaks not merely in the name of God but as God in the first person singular.” Mercer Dictionary of the Bible, p. 29, reports, “Many angelic references in the OT speak of ‘the angel of the Lord’ or ‘the angel of Yahweh.’ In some of these texts, such as Exod 3:2–4, this particular angel is virtually indistinguishable from Yahweh himself. . . . In this case and others (Gen 21:17–21; 22:11–14), the term ‘angel of the Lord’ seems to be a reference to God as he is perceived by human beings.” Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2, p. 957, similarly states, “A further ambiguity is due to the fact that the Bible does not always distinguish clearly between God and His messenger.” The New International Dictionary of the Bible, p. 47, comments, “In almost every case, this messenger is regarded as deity and yet is distinguished from God (Gen 16:7–14; 22:11–18; 31:11, 13; Exod 3:2–5; Num 22:22–35; Judg 6:11–23; 13:2–25; 1 Kings 19:5–7; 1 Chron 21:15–17). These references show that the Angel is the Lord himself adopting a visible form (and therefore a human appearance) for the sake of speaking with people (e.g., Judg 13:6, 10, 21). While himself holy as God is holy (e.g., Exod 3:2–5), the Angel expresses the Holy One’s condescension to walk among sinners (·Exod.,‚ 32:34; 33:3).” That the ante-Nicaean Christian writers identified the angel Yahweh, the second Yahweh, with Yahushua the messiah see above footnote 58. 10 t he P reexiStence of the M eSSiAhNext >